CSM 6: my votes and motivations
Mar15

It’s time to vote for CSM6, and with having two accounts, I’ve decided that one vote will go to a candidate that best aligns with my personal interests, and the second one is going to go to a more generalist kind of person.
As per usual, since I don’t really have to time to keep up with the details, I’ve pulled out the vote matcher again. It’s an OK tool but make sure to read the candidates full campaign as well as the explanation for their answers. Some questions are really strong opinions, such as “this or that are the most important”. For those I picked that I don’t know or don’t have an opinion, because some of them are indeed pressing issues, but I do not agree with them getting a full expansion assigned to them, at least no exclusively. Lowsec, piracy, faction war and industry all deserve some love in my book, and roleplay a little as well, but I like my expansions to address several issues where possible. And even when choosing one favorite I doubt a single expansion is going to magically fix a single issue. These things are all rather big.
So, the candidate who best aligns with my views according to the vote matcher is Roc Wieler. I filled in the questionnaire twice on different days, and twice he came out at the top with a 60% match. Makes sense, he is after all a fellow blogger, roleplay enthusiast, the person who spoke up about not being able to run for CSM while having had a media account, and also the person who revealed that us recent fansite program additions should have received said media account. Which CCP Adida did in fact personally mail me about after I commented on Roc’s blog, and got me sorted with, all within a matter of hours. I’m still impressed about that, cause they could have just ignored that!
But back to Roc and his candidacy. Roc as a character and blogger is an interesting phenomena. He’s got self-promotion down to an art, this powerful image that combines both character and player. Casiella, who’s opinion I value, recommended to vote against him. I can understand why he feels as such but I don’t agree. As I started this post with, I think there are two kinds of candidates needed to make a good CSM rather than just one: Strong views on pressing issues, and generalists to even things out and help find a middle ground. My second vote is the latter, and I’ll get to that in a bit. I’m not familiar with the past history for exclusion and disdain, but I can’t see why monetizing one’s blog is a bad thing. As much as we should all write for the fun of it, we all need income, and if you can do that through doing something you enjoy doing then why not?
As for Roc’s campaign trail, I don’t agree on every solution exclusively as he outlines it. I do agree however that the issues brought up are things the CSM should talk about, even the unpleasant ones or those who are deeply ingrained into the core of EVE, and making a suggestion on how to possibly fix things is a good way to get a discussion going. If a suggestion is met with a lot of “DO NOT WANT!” then you at least know what might not be the way to go about it and that helps with narrowing down the possibilities.
But enough on Roc. My second vote is going to Gehen Sealbreaker, a soon to be member of PRELI, who came out with a much lower 49%. It’s an underdog vote, but due to him talking quite a bit in our public channel ‘Naraka OOC’ he’s the only candidate who I’ve been able to ask questions real-time. He is a generalist, with some love towards the roleplayers, but even about that he seeks for solutions that benefit everyone. If you look at his campaign site, he’s doing quite well for a newcomer, certain things like examples on how he is a social person and how that benefits his campaign are basic tools of the trade when selling oneself to a larger audience and he’s using them right. If I am honest however I fear the basics may not enough to compete with the more experienced people, who both have the name and the tools, but he’s doing well for a beginner and that has merit. Do take a look at his stuff please, especially if the vote matcher brings him up in your personal top 5.
You may notice that both my votes are going to candidates who support roleplay. If you know me a little, then you know I am not your standard RP elitist and in fact very much loathe that crowd. Roleplay does not make you a better player and does not entitle you to any special treatment by CCP, let that be clear. But EVE being a MMORPG, and having a solid base for roleplay and a driven storyline and backstory team, I do think it has in it what other MMORPG’s cannot make true. EVE is a single shard game, meaning that roleplayers and non-roleplayers all share the same world, and I wouldn’t want to have it otherwise. RP shards / servers in other games are this constant fight over “who should be allowed to play here” and “how should the rules be enforced” with a whole lot of crying about “developer X does not care about RP /tears”. I’ve also found that during my entire carreer in EVE I have roleplayed more, felt less forced into having to do it because of a server ruleset, and by extension has a lot better RP experience. I’m in fact more in character than in other MMO’s where I chose an RP server and put more work into character development.
On the subject of roleplay, I also feel that by involving roleplay into aspects of the game, such as factional warfare or incursions you create a richer experience for all players. It makes things make sense in the greater whole, and it provides motivations to do them. The whole buildup to the incursions gives you a reason to shoot Sansha, or to defend them (sadly game mechanics do not support that so well, but player creativity goes a long way). If it was just added without background, just rats randomly showing up and being annoying till you get rid of them, it would be a whole lot less bland. Yes, even for the true opposite of the RP elitist, the people who scoff on anything RP because it is “stupid” or “for geeks” (we’re all playing with internet spaceships here!). It is not a base requirement for candidates, in the past I have voted for candidates who didn’t have this as part of their campaign or carried no real opinion on it, but it sure is a nice to have something I do care about receiving some candidate love.
Lastly I want to give a small shoutout to Mynxee, she was well worth my vote on the last CSM and it is a shame she will not run again. I totally understand her desire to focus on other matters and she is allowed a rest after all the work she did. She isn’t afraid to speak up or offend but she also balances that with being this listening mother figure. Add to that my personal bias for her being a blogging pirate lady. The rest of CSM5 also deserves praise, there was lots of building and improving upon previous efforts and achievements, and that’s just how it should be. Kuddos to CCP as well, I was one of those feeling skeptical in the beginning on just where this CSM thing would strand, but as this dev blog reminds us much good has come from it, as well as important learning experiences from the bad. Not something to be taken for granted.













